"Little boxes on the hillside,
little boxes made of ticky-tacky,
little boxes, little boxes, little boxes
little boxes all the same"
- Malvia Reynold
Until I devoured George Ritzer’s book The MacDonaldization of society, I was thinking everything is very normal in our society, but now I realized we all are enchanted by the process called McDonaldization. Otherwise you tell me, whenever you get in to a McDonald’s or any fast-food restaurant, have you ever (I never) surmised why the guys in work are ‘acting’ very buzy, why in the shop only a few seats to sit but why more tables, why not any newspaper but only a TV above? Why not there is any kitchen inside and why they show their messy kitchen out? Why only a few menu and limited choice to offer? Why always young and energetic chaps are appointed there and why not old or middle aged? Why always the workers are replaced with others and why they have a uniform? And most often the employee asks us whether you eat it here or should he packs? Why the burger or any fast-food shows quantity rather quality? Or at least why the workers are wishing us ‘it’s my pleasure to help you or have a nice day?
little boxes made of ticky-tacky,
little boxes, little boxes, little boxes
little boxes all the same"
- Malvia Reynold
Until I devoured George Ritzer’s book The MacDonaldization of society, I was thinking everything is very normal in our society, but now I realized we all are enchanted by the process called McDonaldization. Otherwise you tell me, whenever you get in to a McDonald’s or any fast-food restaurant, have you ever (I never) surmised why the guys in work are ‘acting’ very buzy, why in the shop only a few seats to sit but why more tables, why not any newspaper but only a TV above? Why not there is any kitchen inside and why they show their messy kitchen out? Why only a few menu and limited choice to offer? Why always young and energetic chaps are appointed there and why not old or middle aged? Why always the workers are replaced with others and why they have a uniform? And most often the employee asks us whether you eat it here or should he packs? Why the burger or any fast-food shows quantity rather quality? Or at least why the workers are wishing us ‘it’s my pleasure to help you or have a nice day?
To
me, these questions were very stupid until I thumped through George Ritzer. Everything
is beyond our expectations and our calculations, the book says.
George
Ritzer is an American sociologist and he published this book in 1983 when
nobody, even in India, envisioned about our today’s 20-20 cricket. He has not
mentioned the term cricket anywhere in the book. Definitely he is not a Malayalee,
and he does not know our Malayala Manorama and there is a least chance he visited
in Hyderabad. But surely he has hinted at least three things, 20-20 cricket and
Malayala Manorama and Hyderabad Tour Packages!
You
read these paragraphs I quoted from his book,
"In
the past few decades, the leadership of collegiate and professional (cricket)
decided that fans raised in the McDonald’s era wanted to see faster games and
many more (runs). In other words from (Cricket) what they got from their fast
food restaurant- great speed and large quantities. It was believed, apparently
correctly, that faster and higher scoring games would mean greater attendance
and higher profits. Instead of the often
the defender taking his turn at his bat, someone whose main (and sometimes
only) skill is hitting replaces him. Designated hitters will get more hits, hit
more runs, and help produce more runs that defender who are allowed to bat.
(quote continues...)"
"Stories
in (Malayala Manorama) usually do not jump from one page to another; they start
and finish on the same page. To meet this need, long, complex stories often
have to be reduced to a few paragraphs. Much of a stories context, and much of
what the principles have to say, is severely cut back or omitted entirely. With
its emphasis on light news and graphics, the main function of the newspaper
seems to be entertainment".
Thousands
of words are emerged prefixing McDonald’s or at least two simple letters ‘Mc’.
McDentists, McDoctors, McChild, McStables, McPaper, McSex are some of these words.
So
this term seems nothing to do with our eating habit. He explains in the book
"This
is not a book about McDonald’s, or even the fast-food business, although both will
be discussed frequently throughout these pages. Rather, MacDonald’s serves here
as the major example, the ‘paradigm’ of a wide ranging process I call McDonaldization,
that is
The
process by which the principle of the fast food restaurant are coming to
dominate more and more sectors of American society as well as of the rest of
the world".
Why
McDonald? Four alluring dimensions lie at the heart of the success of this
model and more generally, of McDonaldization. McDonald’s has succeeded because
it offers consumers, workers, and managers efficiency, calculability, predictability
and control.
It
offers the best available method to get from being hungry to being full.
Calculability or an emphasis on the quantities aspects of products sold.
Quantity has become equivalent to quality; a lot of something, or the quick
delivery of it, means it must be good. As a culture, we tend to believe deeply
that in general ‘bigger is better’. Predictability: the assurance that their
product and services will be the same over time and in all locales. The people
who eat in fast-food restaurants are controlled, albeit subtly. Lines, limited
menus, few options, and uncomfortable seats all lead diners to do what managers
wishes to do- eat quickly and leave.
After
this point Ritzer goes far and compares all most all our social institution and
checks how all these are McDonaldized. His extreme comparison of McDonald’s
with Holocaust is worthwhile which seems he has such a strong disgust against the
system called McDonald’s. McDonaldization
and Holocaust show the same process, effectiveness, calculability,
predictability, controlling and irrationality of rationality. The holocaust is
an ‘efficient’ means for the destruction of massive numbers of human beings and
it’s quite calculable that how many people could be killed in the shortest
period of time (calculability) was effort to make mass murder predictable.
Victims were controlled by a huge non human technology including the camps, the
train system, the crematoria, and the bureaucracy that managed the entire
process. He uses Weberian concept of bureaucracy and he shows if we examine the
beurocrartization and McDonazation both share the same things. If we extend the
McDonazation methods we can apply this theory to Shopping malls, entertainment,
health care system, education and even pregnancy and death.
For
instance when we hear Americans are hardly doing abortion, don’t think it a
very positive thing rather they have already made everything possible to avoid
the ‘abortion’, such as the selection of preferred gender, semen for a healthy
and non diseased child, keeping a tentative pregnancy, doing all medical check
up to see the ‘product’ called child in a ‘factory’ called hospital. Even death
today becomes very McDonaldized, you can now compare all the leading point of
McDonaldability of death also. Death becomes a rather entertaining business.
Read this adv.
‘You
will now have a choice! Louiseville’s affordable funarel home is your best
choice; professional services $995; metal caskets as low as $160; opening May
1, 1994’
After
all McDonaldization is nothing but the Americanization of society in a bad way.
This
letter to the boss of McDonalds from a very passionate consumer when the main
shop was in a verge of closing down: ‘Please don’t teare it down! Your
company’s name a household word, not only in the United states of America, but
all over the world. TO destroy this major artefact of contemporary culture
would, indeed, destroy part of the faith the people of the world have in your
company. (ER. Ship).
Like
many of our scholars, Ritzer does not end up the book without any creative suggestion,
but from the very first page he is telling how to lead a unMcDonaldized life
today, in the concluding chapter he puts forwards a number of practical solution
to escape from the McDonaldization, but the million dollar question is whether
we learn a half lesion from it?